🔗 Share this article

For months, coercive messages persisted. Originally, reportedly from a retired cop and an ex-military commander, and then from law enforcement directly. Finally, one resident states he was called to law enforcement headquarters and told clearly: stop speaking out or encounter real trouble.

Shaikh is part of a group fighting a high-value redevelopment plan where this historic settlement – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – will be demolished and transformed by a large business group.

"The unique ecosystem of this area is exceptional in the globe," says Shaikh. "But their intention is to dismantle our social fabric and silence our voices."

Dual Worlds

The narrow alleys of the slum sit in stark contrast to the towering buildings and luxury apartments that dominate the neighborhood. Residences are built haphazardly and often missing basic amenities, informal businesses produce dangerous fumes and the atmosphere is saturated with the overpowering odor of uncovered waste channels.

To some, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a modern district of premium apartments, well-maintained green spaces, modern retail complexes and homes with two toilets is an aspirational dream achieved.

"We lack sufficient health services, roads or water management and we have no places for children to play," states A Selvin Nadar, 56, who migrated from southern India in the early eighties. "The sole solution is to demolish everything and construct proper housing."

Resident Opposition

Yet certain residents, such as the leather artisan, are resisting the project.

Everyone acknowledges that this community, consistently overlooked as an illegal encroachment, is in stark need investment and development. But they are concerned that this initiative – lacking resident participation – might convert premium city property into a luxury development, forcing out the marginalized, migrant communities who have been there since the late 1800s.

These were these shunned, migrant workers who built up the uninhabited area into a widely studied marvel of self-reliance and commercial output, whose economic value is valued at between $1m and $2m a year, making it among the globe's biggest informal economies.

Relocation Worries

Out of about a million people living in the dense 220-hectare zone, a minority will be able for alternative accommodation in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take seven years to finish. The remainder will be moved to wastelands and saline fields on the remote edges of the metropolis, potentially break up a long-established community. Certain individuals will receive no residences at all.

People eligible to stay in the neighborhood will be provided units in tower blocks, a substantial change from the evolved, shared lifestyle of living and working that has supported Dharavi for generations.

Industries from tailoring to pottery and recycling are projected to decrease in quantity and be transferred to a specific "industrial sector" far from residential areas.

Existential Threat

For those such as this protester, a workshop owner and long-time resident to call home the slum, the redevelopment presents an existential threat. His rickety, three-storey workshop makes apparel – formal jackets, luxury coats, studded bomber jackets – sold in premium stores in south Mumbai and overseas.

Household members lives in the spaces underneath and his workers and garment workers – migrants from other states – live there, enabling him to afford their labour. Outside Dharavi's enclave, accommodation prices are often significantly costlier for basic accommodation.

Threats and Warning

At the administrative buildings nearby, an illustrated mock-up of the Dharavi project shows a contrasting perspective. Slickly dressed residents move around on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, acquiring continental baguettes and breakfast items and enlisting beverages on an outdoor area adjacent to a restaurant and Ice-Cream. This depicts a stark contrast from the inexpensive idli sambar morning meal and budget beverage that supports the neighborhood.

"This represents no progress for us," says Shaikh. "This constitutes an enormous property transaction that will render it impossible for residents to remain."

There is also distrust of the development company. Headed by a prominent businessman – one of India's most powerful and an associate of the government head – the corporation has been subject to claims of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it rejects.

While local authorities calls it a joint project, the developer invested nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A lawsuit stating that the initiative was improperly granted to the developer is being considered in the nation's highest judicial body.

Sustained Harassment

After they started to actively protest the development, local opponents assert they have been faced an extended period of pressure and threats – involving communications, explicit warnings and insinuations that criticizing the project was comparable with anti-national sentiment – by figures they assert work for the business conglomerate.

Included in these suspected of delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c